Case 2408590/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Dousi v SRBY Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408590/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Dousi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 13 February 2023, Employment Judge Benson found that SRBY Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by not paying her at her correct rate of pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £132.50 gross for that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's correct holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £396.08 gross. A separate claim concerning the provision of a statement of main terms of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed.
The written notice appended to the judgment states that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums are not paid within 14 days of the written record being sent, with the relevant decision day identified as 21 February 2023 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum. No separate interest figure was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid the claimant at her correct rate of pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £132.50. | Upheld | — | £133 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's correct holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £396.08. | Upheld | — | £396 |
| Other | A claim that the claimant was provided with a statement of main terms of employment pursuant to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £529
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.