Case 2408602/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Wendon v Fulfilled Living Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408602/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Wendon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined, under Rule 21, that Fulfilled Living Limited had made two unauthorised deductions from Mrs J Wendon’s wages. First, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the full amount due for work done and ordered payment of £383.15 net.
Second, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £303.60 gross. The judgment does not allocate any additional remedy beyond those two sums, and it includes the standard interest notice but no quantified interest award in the dispositive part of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for unpaid work done and ordered payment of the net sum of £383.15. | Upheld | — | £383 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £303.60. | Upheld | — | £304 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £687
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.