Case 2408633/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Massey v Estar Truck and Van Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408633/2022
- Decision date
- 20 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Massey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Liverpool on 8 February 2023 before Employment Judge Shotter, found that Mr S Massey had suffered an unlawful deduction of wages. The judgment states that the claimant’s claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered eStar Truck and Van Limited to pay the claimant unpaid wages in the sum of £667.50 within 28 days. No separate split of the award was given beyond that unpaid wages figure.
The accompanying notice on interest stated that interest would not be payable if the sum was paid within 14 days after the written record of the decision was sent to the parties on 20 February 2023, and that otherwise interest would accrue at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum. No separate quantified interest award was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant suffered an unlawful deduction of wages and that the claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay unpaid wages of £667.50. | Upheld | — | £668 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £668
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.