Case 2408636/2023 · Employment Tribunal
B Jones v Rotating Maintenance Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408636/2023
- Decision date
- 1 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 9 August 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal adjudged that B Jones was dismissed by reason of redundancy. The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,896.00. No other claim type, liability finding, or split remedy was recorded in the judgment.
The accompanying interest notice stated the relevant decision day as 1 November 2023, the calculation day as 2 November 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum. The judgment itself did not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal, acting under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, adjudged that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,896.00. | Upheld | — | £7,896 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,896
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.