Case 2408657/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Thomdon v GN Hospitality Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408657/2022
- Decision date
- 20 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Thomdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. On that basis, Employment Judge McDonald made a determination on the claim without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that GN Hospitality Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms B Thomdon's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £76.00, calculated as £9.50 per hour for 8 hours, in respect of August 2022.
The written record also contained an interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating the relevant decision day, calculation day and stipulated rate of interest of 8% per annum. No separate quantified interest amount was set out in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determination was made under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £76.00 for August 2022. | Upheld | — | £76 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £76
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.