Case 2408668/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Brennan v RJW Engineering (Manchester) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408668/2022
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Brennan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Anderson, heard the claim at Manchester via CVP on 24 January 2023. The claimant was Mr L Brennan and the respondent was RJW Engineering (Manchester) Limited.
The written record states that the claimant’s claims for unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract were not well founded and were dismissed. No separate monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
The notes on the judgment record that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s standard procedure. The extracted written judgment therefore records the outcomes only, without a detailed written analysis of the evidence or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.