Case 2408691/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Barber v Fulfilled Living Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2408691/2020
- Decision date
- 10 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Barber
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Batten found that Fulfilled Living Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Ms L Barber's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £333.00.
The judgment does not set out any wider reasons, split the award into separate components, or identify any discrimination, dismissal, or other additional claims. The only monetary figure in the judgment itself is the net sum awarded for the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
An accompanying interest notice stated the relevant decision day as 10 December 2020 and explained that interest may accrue if the sum remains unpaid after 14 days, but no separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £333.00. | Upheld | — | £333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £333
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.