Case 2408703/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Young v Heatrod Elements Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408703/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Young brought claims against Heatrod Elements Ltd for unpaid holiday pay on termination, unfair dismissal, and unlawful deductions from wages. The hearing was by video on 2 March 2023 before Employment Judge Buzzard sitting alone. The judgment records that the holiday pay claim was not resisted and succeeded, with the respondent ordered to pay the agreed sum of £439.25 within 28 days.
The unfair dismissal claim was also not resisted and succeeded. However, the tribunal found that the claimant had fully caused his own dismissal by his contributory conduct, and it therefore awarded no financial compensation for that claim.
The unlawful deductions from wages claim was dismissed because it had been presented outside the time limit for bringing such a claim and the tribunal was not satisfied that it had been reasonably practicable to present it in time. The written judgment notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's notice.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay on termination was not resisted and succeeded; the respondent was ordered to pay the agreed amount within 28 days. | Upheld | — | £439 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was not resisted and succeeded, but the tribunal found the claimant had fully caused his own dismissal by contributory conduct and awarded no financial compensation on this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit and it was not reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £439
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.