Case 2408721/2023 · Employment Tribunal
S Sancheti v ZM OM Brands Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408721/2023
- Decision date
- 22 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Sancheti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Allen recorded that ZM OM Brands Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from S Sancheti's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £250.26.
The judgment does not set out any disputed factual findings or legal analysis beyond the conclusion that the deduction was unauthorised. It is therefore a straightforward unlawful deduction from wages decision with a single monetary award.
The attached interest notice stated that, if the award is not paid within 14 days after the judgment was sent to the parties on 22 December 2023, interest may accrue from 23 December 2023 at the stipulated rate of 8% under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. No separate interest amount was calculated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £250.26. The judgment also included the standard interest notice, stating that interest may accrue if the sum is unpaid after 14 days, with a stipulated rate of 8%, but no separate interest amount was assessed in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.