Case 2408731/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Paula Wilson v Cheryl Jackson Cuppa Cake Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408731/2022
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Malik
- Venue
- Manchester ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Paula Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 3 March 2023, Employment Judge Malik sitting alone found that Cheryl Jackson Cuppa Cake Limited had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay Mrs Paula Wilson her wages for the period 6 August 2022 to 5 November 2022. That complaint succeeded, and the tribunal ordered payment of £2,954.49 gross, described as the sum unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay Mrs Wilson in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday for the 2022 leave year. That complaint likewise succeeded, and the tribunal ordered payment of £376.03 gross. The tribunal recorded a total amount payable of £3,330.52. The written notice also stated the relevant decision day for interest purposes was 14 March 2023, the calculation day was 15 March 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if any award remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay wages from 6 August 2022 to 5 November 2022 and held the complaint well founded. | Upheld | — | £2,954 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday for the leave year 2022 and held the complaint well founded. | Upheld | — | £376 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,331
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.