Case 2408754/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Henderson v The Rising Sun Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408754/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Henderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in the absence of a response form from The Rising Sun (Mossley) Limited. The tribunal made no judgment in this case on unlawful deductions from pay, redundancy payment, notice pay or holiday entitlement because those matters had already been covered in case 2409216/2020. It also held that the complaint about tax and national insurance deductions was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction and should be raised with HMRC.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide Ms J Henderson with a written statement of the main terms of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay four weeks' pay, assessed at £262.72. The written statement claim was therefore upheld, and the only monetary award recorded in this judgment was £262.72.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint about tax and national insurance deductions; the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction and said such matters should be raised with HMRC. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of the main terms of employment; the tribunal ordered four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £263 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.