Case 2408754/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Johnston v Steadplan Truck and Trailer Sales Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408754/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal by CVP on 4, 5 and 6 October 2023 before Employment Judge Thompson sitting alone. The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal and also dismissed his breach of contract complaints concerning notice pay and commission payments.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint that the Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. The Respondent's application for costs under Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was likewise dismissed. The judgment provides no written reasons beyond recording those outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint in relation to commission payments. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint for failing to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.