Case 2408756/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Coke v Barton Huxley Management Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408756/2023
- Decision date
- 1 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Coke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Ms J Coke's case against Barton Huxley Management Limited, the Tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to determine the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unpaid accrued holiday, unlawful deduction from wages, and breach of contract concerning unpaid notice of termination of employment. Those claims were therefore dismissed. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the complaints and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to determine this complaint and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to determine the complaint of unpaid accrued holiday and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to determine this complaint and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to determine the complaint of unpaid notice of termination of employment and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.