Case 2408767/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Speakman v Urgent Care 365 Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408767/2023
- Decision date
- 17 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Speakman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal dealt with the claim on the papers and accepted the claimant's figures for the monetary heads set out in the judgment.
The tribunal found that Urgent Care 365 Limited had made unauthorised deductions from wages between 1 and 21 July 2023 and ordered payment of £1,137.06 gross. The judgment records the arithmetic used: a £45,000 annual salary, converted to a weekly figure of £865.38, multiplied by three weeks, with £1,459.08 already received from the Insolvency Service deducted from that sum.
It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £497.95 gross, reflecting one week's statutory notice at £865.38 less £367.43 already received from the Insolvency Service. A further £589.65 was awarded as damages for breach of contract for mileage and expenses incurred travelling to the respondent's London premises, and the judgment records that this sum was not taxable.
The tribunal additionally found that accrued but untaken annual leave on termination had not been paid and awarded £424.99 gross after crediting £1,066.96 already received from the Insolvency Service. The tribunal said it would make no further award for additional days unless the claimant provided further calculation details and proof within 14 days. The total gross award was £2,649.65, and the notice to the parties states that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award remains unpaid after 14 days, with the stipulated rate stated as 8% per annum from 18 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages between 1 and 21 July 2023. The gross award was calculated by reference to an annual salary of £45,000, three weeks' gross pay, and a deduction for £1,459.08 already received from the Insolvency Service on 14 November 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,137 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. The award was calculated as one week's statutory notice at £865.38 gross per week less £367.43 already received from the Insolvency Service on 14 November 2023. | Upheld | — | £498 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to reimburse mileage and expenses incurred by the claimant during travel to the respondent's London premises. The tribunal awarded damages for breach of contract and recorded that this sum was not taxable. | Upheld | — | £590 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. The award was calculated as 8.62 days at £173.08 gross per day less £1,066.96 already received from the Insolvency Service on 14 November 2024. The tribunal said no further award for additional days would be made unless the claimant provided further calculation details and proof within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £425 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,650
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.