Case 2408769/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W M Tariq v Alexander & Partners — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408769/2023
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W M Tariq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen issued a Rule 21 judgment on 19 December 2023. The tribunal found that Alexander & Partners had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr W M Tariq's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,395.81 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,666.56 gross. The judgment therefore records two successful money claims, with a combined gross award of £4,062.37.
The written notice accompanying the judgment states that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums are not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day. It identifies 28 December 2023 as the relevant decision day, 29 December 2023 as the calculation day, and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,396 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment uses the phrase 'holiday entitlement'. | Upheld | — | £1,667 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,062
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.