Case 2408796/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Oliver’s Hairstyling Hale Ltd and Vocla Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408796/2022
- Decision date
- 12 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gibson PARTIES
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, hearing this case together with case 2409421/2022 but issuing separate written judgments, found that the complaint of unpaid wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's pay for the period 1 October 2022 to 31 October 2022.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the agreed gross sum of £2,380.95. No split between different heads of loss was recorded in the judgment.
The second respondent's application for a costs order was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from pay for the period 1 October 2022 to 31 October 2022 and ordered payment of the agreed gross sum of £2,380.95. | Upheld | — | £2,381 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,381
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.