Case 2408802/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Jones v Ribinns Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408802/2021
- Decision date
- 18 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr C Jones, did not attend the final hearing listed to be heard by CVP on 8 October 2021. The tribunal was not notified in advance that he did not intend to attend, attempts to contact him when the hearing was due to start were unsuccessful, and the tribunal noted that he had not communicated with the tribunal or the respondent since lodging his claim.
The tribunal was satisfied that notice of hearing had been properly served on the claimant and that the link for the hearing had been sent to the address held for him. Because no reason for the claimant's absence was provided, Employment Judge Sharkett dismissed the unlawful deduction from wages claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.