Case 2408824/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Dixon v Upperby Social Club Limited (in Receivership) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408824/2022
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Dixon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 10 November 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined part of the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Mrs A Dixon was dismissed as redundant when the respondent closed. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment from the respondent in the sum of £1,824.00.
The remaining claims for notice pay and holiday pay were not determined in this judgment. They were to be listed for a preliminary hearing to consider whether those complaints had been presented in time under the relevant statutory provisions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed as redundant when the respondent closed and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,824.00. | Upheld | — | £1,824 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,824
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.