Case 2408828/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ready v C & C Entwistle Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408828/2021
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ready
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Ready’s sole claim succeeded. The tribunal found that C & C Entwistle Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,896.75 gross.
The award was broken down into £1,069.20 gross for 12 days of accrued holiday pay in the period 1 January 2021 to 5 June 2021 that remained unpaid on termination of employment. The remaining £827.55 gross was for wages paid below the relevant National Living Wage in the periods 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 and 1 April 2021 to 5 June 2021.
The judgment does not record any other claims, any split of the award beyond those two wage components, or any separate remedy such as costs or injury to feelings. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages. The award was made up of £1,069.20 gross for 12 days accrued holiday pay unpaid on termination and £827.55 gross for pay below the relevant National Living Wage. | Upheld | — | £1,897 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,897
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.