Case 2408831/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wilson v Holchem Laboratories Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408831/2020
- Decision date
- 10 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peck REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Wilson brought a claim against Holchem Laboratories Ltd described by the tribunal as a constructive unfair dismissal claim. At the hearing on 28 May 2021 before Employment Judge Peck, the tribunal first held that the claim should not be struck out under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2010.
The tribunal then found that the claim had been presented out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought in time. On that basis the claim was struck out for want of jurisdiction. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was described by the tribunal as a constructive unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal held that it was presented out of time, that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been brought in time, and struck it out for want of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.