Case 2408840/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Major v Singh Academy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408840/2021
- Decision date
- 21 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ficklin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Major
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Ficklin at Manchester by Cloud Video Platform on 7 October 2022. The claimant, Ms G Major, appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The judgment records that the tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
The tribunal decided that it did not have jurisdiction to hear Ms Major's claims for unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unauthorised deduction of wages because each claim was out of time. No substantive findings on liability were made, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.