Case 2408852/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Livesey v Heaton Park Garage Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408852/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Livesey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 January 2023, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, because he did not appear to have the 2 years' service ordinarily required to bring such a claim and had not explained why that requirement did not apply. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment notes that the claimant's remaining claim was still listed for hearing on 14 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant did not have the 2 years' service ordinarily required to claim unfair dismissal and did not explain why that requirement did not apply, or did not make sufficient representations after being invited to do so by letter dated 11 January 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.