Case 2408881/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gardner v Advanced Oncotherapy plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408881/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gardner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3, presented on 30 November 2023, that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary of £3,796.67 for May 2023 and £2,876.91 for 1 to 23 June 2023, together with unpaid holiday pay of £1,100 for 6.50 days untaken leave. The judgment therefore treated those sums as established by admission rather than dispute.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £7,773.58 in total in settlement of the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and were not provided in writing in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3 presented on 30 November 2023 that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary of £3,796.67 for May 2023 and £2,876.91 for 1 to 23 June 2023, before termination. | Upheld | — | £6,674 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3 that the claimant was entitled to unpaid holiday pay of £1,100 in respect of 6.50 days untaken leave. | Upheld | — | £1,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,774
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.