Case 2408923/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Cheshire Road Private Day Nursery Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2408923/2022
- Decision date
- 3 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 29 June 2023, Employment Judge Sharkett Date struck out the claimant's claims in case 2408923/2022 under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claimant had been given an opportunity to show why the claims should not be struck out for want of jurisdiction and/or because they had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d).
The judgment further records that no response, and no request for a hearing, was received. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text states that the claimant's claims in case number 2408923/2022 were struck out under Rule 37; the specific claim heads are taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text states that the claimant's claims in case number 2408923/2022 were struck out under Rule 37; the specific claim heads are taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The extracted judgment text states that the claimant's claims in case number 2408923/2022 were struck out under Rule 37; the specific claim heads are taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.