Case 2408933/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Grundy v SASSF Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408933/2021
- Decision date
- 7 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Grundy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Grundy brought a claim against SASSF Limited, and the respondent failed to present a valid response in time. Employment Judge Phil Allen therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment is dated 7 January 2022 and records the awards made on the papers.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £1,567.50. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,090 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £334.40 gross. No separate interest figure or other remedy component is recorded in the judgment. The total of the awards recorded is £3,991.90.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,568 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,090 |
| Holiday pay | The extracted text reads "£334,40 gross"; treated here as £334.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £334 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,992
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.