Case 2408940/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Clarke v UK Home Furniture Limited t/a Moon Furniture — 2022
- Case reference
- 2408940/2021
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dennehy Date
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Clarke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 24 June 2022, Employment Judge Dennehy found that UK Home Furniture Limited t/a Moon Furniture had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P Clarke's wages by failing to pay him in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. The tribunal assessed the sum due on a gross basis at £648, calculated as 9 days at £72 per day.
The tribunal ordered payment of that sum, subject to any deductions for tax and national insurance contributions before payment. The judgment also records the usual interest notice: if the amount is not paid within 14 days after the written judgment was sent, interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate of 8% from 8 July 2022.
The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of 9 days' accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. The amount was calculated gross at 9 days x £72. | Upheld | — | £648 |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed. The judgment does not specify the legal basis of the counterclaim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £648
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.