Case 2408959/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Michael Williams v TC Engineering Glossop Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408959/2023
- Decision date
- 9 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms L Atkinson, Ms A Berkeley-Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michael Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Manchester on 21, 22 November and 3 December 2024 before Employment Judge Cline with Ms L Atkinson and Ms A Berkeley-Hill, dismissed the claimant's claims for ordinary unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal. The judgment records that both claims were not well-founded.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning. It notes that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days. No remedy was awarded, and no monetary figures are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for ordinary unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for automatic unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. The extracted text does not specify the statutory basis beyond that description, but the case was listed as including public interest disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.