Case 2408963/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Hebblethwaite Respondent Me To You Care North West Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING v D Park, Solicitor — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408963/2023
- Decision date
- 24 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Hebblethwaite Respondent Me To You Care North West Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Manchester on 10 June 2024, Employment Judge Batten, sitting alone, considered the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, holiday pay and unauthorised deductions from wages. The Tribunal dismissed all of those complaints on the ground that they had not been presented in time under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented before the end of the three-month limitation period. No remedy was awarded because the claims were dismissed in limine on limitation grounds. The written record of the decision was sent to the parties on 24 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented to the Tribunal in accordance with section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to present the claim before the end of the three-month period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented to the Tribunal in accordance with section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to present the claim before the end of the three-month period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented to the Tribunal in accordance with section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to present the claim before the end of the three-month period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented to the Tribunal in accordance with section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the Tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to present the claim before the end of the three-month period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable to present the claim before the end of the period of three months
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.