Case 2408973/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Miller v Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408973/2023
- Decision date
- 23 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Humble REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Miller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent did not make unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and was not in breach of the claimant's contract of employment in relation to holiday pay. That claim was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the respondent did not make unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and was not in breach of contract in relation to sick pay. That claim was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of the claimant's contract of employment by failing to pay the claimant full statutory notice pay. It ordered the respondent to pay an additional £2,539.80.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal dismissed the claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions or breached contract in relation to holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claim that the respondent made unauthorised deductions or breached contract in relation to sick pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found breach of contract in respect of failure to pay full statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,540 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,540
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.