Case 2408974/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Eager v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408974/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Eager
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay against the respondent. In its ET3 presented on 30 November 2023, the respondent admitted that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary of £13,852.00 gross (for May to August 2023) and a further £769.23 gross representing one week's pay as a retention bonus payable in June 2023. The Tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total sum of £14,621.23 in settlement of the original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay.
The claimant accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction over four further complaints: unpaid pension contributions, notice pay (the claimant remains employed by the respondent), additional financial loss relating to interest and costs from credit card bills, and compensation for stress to the claimant and family. The claimant agreed that these four complaints could be dismissed upon his withdrawal.
The claimant had also applied on 3 January 2024 to amend his claim to include additional unpaid wages arising after the original claim was presented. In the absence of any objection from the respondent and given their non-attendance at the hearing, the application to amend was allowed and that complaint will be dealt with under the case management orders made in the Note of Preliminary Hearing for claimants in the Jimenez multiple, dated 22 February 2024. The respondent did not attend the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3 (presented 30 November 2023) that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary of £13,852.00 gross for May to August 2023. | Upheld | — | £13,852 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent admitted entitlement to unpaid salary of £769.23 gross in respect of a retention bonus representing one week's pay payable in June 2023. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the total sum of £14,621.23 is paid in settlement of the claimant's original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. The award is not separately broken down between holiday pay and unlawful deductions in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Complaint in respect of unpaid pension contributions: claimant accepted the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction and agreed it could be dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint in respect of notice pay: claimant accepted the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction as the claimant remains employed by the respondent; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Complaint in respect of additional financial loss in relation to interest and costs arising from credit card bills: claimant accepted the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction; dismissed upon withdrawal. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,621
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.