Case 2408976/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Berry v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408976/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Berry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms A Berry, brought complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay against Advanced Oncotherapy plc. The respondent did not attend the hearing on 29 February 2024 before Employment Judge Johnson at Manchester, but had admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3 (presented on 30 November 2023) that the claimant was entitled to gross unpaid salary of £8,666.66 for May to June 2023 and £300.00 for 1.5 days of accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement at termination on 30 June 2023.
The Tribunal recorded the admitted sums and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £8,966.66 in settlement of the original wages and holiday pay complaints. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were directed to be produced unless requested within 14 days.
The claimant accepted that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine her further complaints concerning unpaid pension contributions and interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, and those complaints were accordingly dismissed upon withdrawal. A separate statutory notice regarding interest under Article 12 of the 1990 Order was issued alongside the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent admitted entitlement in section 6.1 of the ET3 (gross unpaid salary for May to June 2023). Respondent did not attend the hearing. | Upheld | — | £8,667 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent admitted entitlement to 1.5 days' accrued holiday pay at termination on 30 June 2023. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Other | Complaint regarding unpaid pension contributions: claimant accepted the Tribunal had no jurisdiction; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Complaint for interest contrary to the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990: claimant accepted the Tribunal had no jurisdiction; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,967
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.