Case 2408978/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Long v Morris Homes (North) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408978/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Long
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 18 May 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the disability discrimination complaint should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order made after the hearing on 26 February 2021. The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of disability discrimination. No remedy was assessed for that claim in this judgment.
The claimant's remaining unfair dismissal claim was left listed for hearing on 18 and 19 November 2021. The tribunal recorded that it would now be heard by an Employment Judge sitting alone rather than a full panel, and reminded the claimant to provide his documents to the respondent as soon as possible if he had not already done so.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination complaint because the claimant did not comply with the earlier order and did not make representations or request a hearing after the letter dated 18 May 2021. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.