Case 2408984/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Orrett v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408984/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Orrett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing, but had admitted in its ET3 that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary for May to July 2023, unpaid salary for 1 to 18 August 2023, a retention bonus payable in June 2023, unpaid holiday entitlement accrued at termination, and salary deductions relating to additional personal pension contributions.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £16,598.25 in settlement of the original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. The judgment records the component sums as gross amounts.
The claimant accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine a separate complaint about unpaid pension contributions that should have been made by the respondent on his behalf. That complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The admitted unpaid salary, retention bonus, and salary deductions for additional personal pension contributions total £15,518.40; the judgment's stated total award is £16,598.25, which is £0.02 lower than the sum of all listed components including holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £15,518 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent admitted unpaid holiday entitlement of 6.75 days accrued at termination, assessed at £1,079.87 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
| Other | The claimant accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the complaint about unpaid pension contributions which should have been made by the respondent on his behalf; the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,598
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.