Case 2408990/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Dr C Allen-Megahey v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408990/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr C Allen-Megahey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal confirmed it had jurisdiction to hear the claim because the respondent's business is conducted within England and Wales. The respondent did not attend the hearing on 29 February 2024, and the claimant appeared in person. The respondent had admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3 (presented on 30 November 2023) that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary of £90,416.69 (for May to August 2023) and £2,980.77 (the retention payment due in June 2023, representing one week's earnings).
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £93,397.46 in settlement of the original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages. The complaint regarding holiday pay was not determined, as the claimant had not particularised it, remains employed by the respondent, and the respondent disputes it; the complaint relating to purchased holiday and salary sacrifice payments was similarly left outstanding. The claimant accepted that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction over complaints concerning unpaid pension contributions and fees/interest accrued, and these two complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The claimant's application of 4 January 2024 to amend the claim, seeking to update losses arising since the original claim form, was allowed in the absence of any objection from the non-attending respondent. That complaint will be subject to case management orders within the Note of Preliminary Hearing for claimants in the Jimenez multiple, dated 22 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary for May to August 2023, admitted by respondent at section 6.1 of ET3 presented on 30 November 2023. | Upheld | — | £90,417 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid retention payment due in June 2023 representing one week's earnings; admitted by respondent at section 6.1 of ET3. | Upheld | — | £2,981 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal made no determination: claimant had not particularised the complaint, remains employed by the respondent, and the respondent disputes the claim. Complaint remains outstanding. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Complaint regarding purchased holiday and salary sacrifice payments; not determined in this judgment as respondent disputes it and the matter remains outstanding. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Complaint regarding unpaid pension contributions; claimant accepted Tribunal had no jurisdiction and the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Complaint regarding fees and interest accrued; claimant accepted Tribunal had no jurisdiction and the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £93,397
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.