Case 2408997/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Mock v Custom Accounts Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2408997/2020
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Mock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Phil Allen found that Custom Accounts Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr I Mock's wages. The only substantive order in the judgment was that the respondent pay the claimant the gross sum of £9,300 within 14 days.
The extracted text does not set out any further factual narrative or dispute analysis beyond the finding of unauthorised deduction. No separate split of remedy is given for different heads of loss, and the award is stated as a gross sum rather than as a breakdown between components.
The attached notice explains the tribunal's interest regime under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. It records that the relevant decision day was 1 February 2021, the calculation day was 2 February 2021, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% if the sum remained unpaid after the applicable 14-day period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £9,300 within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £9,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.