Case 2408998/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Cooke v Advanced Oncotherapy plc HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2408998/2023
- Decision date
- 12 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Cooke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr G Cooke, brought complaints against Advanced Oncotherapy plc including unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent did not attend the hearing on 29 February 2024 before Employment Judge Johnson at Manchester. In its ET3 presented on 30 November 2023, the respondent admitted that the claimant was entitled to unpaid salary of £3,863.60 gross for May 2023 and £1,206.24 gross for 1 to 9 June 2023, when his employment terminated.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total sum of £5,069.84 in settlement of the original complaints of unlawful deduction from wages. A further complaint relating to unpaid pension contributions was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, who accepted that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine it.
The judgment is without prejudice to complaints seeking notice pay and holiday pay, which are disputed by the respondent and were the subject of further case management orders made in the Note of Preliminary Hearing dated 22 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent admitted in section 6.1 of its ET3 that the claimant was owed unpaid salary of £3,863.60 (May 2023) and £1,206.24 (1-9 June 2023), totalling £5,069.84. | Upheld | — | £5,070 |
| Other | Complaint in respect of unpaid pension contributions: the claimant accepted the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction; complaint dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,070
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.