Case 2409008/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Rogers v The Bedford Hotel Blackpool Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409008/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Rogers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mr G Rogers against The Bedford Hotel Blackpool Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). It found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract in respect of pension contributions and ordered damages of £208.35.
It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,884.63. The written judgment was dated 10 February 2021 and sent to the parties on 16 February 2021.
An attached notice explained that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if unpaid after 14 days, with the relevant decision day recorded as 16 February 2021, the calculation day as 17 February 2021, and the stipulated rate as 8%. The principal sums awarded total £2,092.98.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract found in respect of pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £208 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,093
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.