Case 2409036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Dillon v Davida (U.K.) Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409036/2020
- Decision date
- 12 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Dillon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Peter Dillon was unfairly dismissed by the respondent, Davida (U.K.) Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation), by reason of redundancy. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 and also ordered the case title to be amended to reflect the correct respondent name.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a compensatory award of £1,144.72. That figure was stated to comprise 2 weeks' net wages at £303.36 per week, plus £538 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment also records that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that Mr Peter Dillon was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy. It ordered a compensatory award of £1,144.72, made up of 2 weeks' net wages at £303.36 per week and £538 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £1,145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,145
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,145
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.