Case 2409046/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Heap v Ashcroft Homecare Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409046/2023
- Decision date
- 25 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Heap
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Ashcroft Homecare Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs D Heap's July 2023 wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £335.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued annual leave entitlement of 29 hours and ordered payment of £304.50. The written decision included the standard notice on tribunal interest, stating the relevant decision day as 25 January 2024 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum, but no separate interest figure was set out in the award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's July 2023 wages. | Upheld | — | £335 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued annual leave entitlement of 29 hours. | Upheld | — | £305 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £640
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.