Case 2409048/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Stephenson v Blue Group UK Retail Ltd (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409048/2020
- Decision date
- 28 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Stephenson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal did not decide the substantive merits of the proceedings brought by Mrs L Stephenson against Blue Group UK Retail Limited (In Administration). Instead, it issued a letter dated 10 September 2022 giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations and did not request a hearing.
As a result, Employment Judge KM Ross ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no findings on unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, or working time issues, and it does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the merits of any pleaded claim. It records that the claimant failed to respond to the Tribunal's 10 September 2022 letter inviting representations or a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out for not having been actively pursued, and the claim was struck out on that basis. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.