Case 2409074/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Charles Zottorvi v Sabio HR Consultancy Limited t/a ELT — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409074/2023
- Decision date
- 16 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Charles Zottorvi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 8 January 2024, Employment Judge Thompson sitting alone found the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well-founded. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal ordered Sabio HR Consultancy Limited t/a ELT to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,640, described in the judgment as the net sum of £1,908.84 deducted from pay.
The written record also contained an interest notice stating that if the award was not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day of 15 January 2024, interest would accrue from 16 January 2024 at 8% per annum under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. No separate quantified interest figure was set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,640, stated as net £1,908.84 deducted from pay. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,640
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.