Case 2409083/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Barber v Greater Resources Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409083/2020
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Barber
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent’s title to Greater Resources Ltd. The claimant’s sole complaint was an unlawful deduction from wages claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal held that the claim was not presented in time under sections 23(2)(a), 23(3A), 23(4) and 207B of the Act, so it would not consider the complaint. It therefore dismissed the claim.
In any event, the tribunal found that the claimant had been paid wages in arrears rather than wages in hand, and that all wages properly payable to him had been paid in the final payment made on 24 January 2020 after termination of employment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim was not presented in time under sections 23(2)(a), 23(3A), 23(4) and 207B ERA 1996 and therefore would not consider it. It also found, in any event, that the claimant was paid wages in arrears rather than in hand and that all wages properly payable had been paid in the final payment on 24 January 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 23(2)(a), 23(3A), 23(4) and 207B ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.