Case 2409087/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Connolly v Radiocoms Systems Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2409087/2023
- Decision date
- 13 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Connolly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Liverpool before Employment Judge Horne on 10 November 2023, heard claims by Mr F Connolly against Radiocoms Systems Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract. The dispute concerned the timing of payment of the claimant's final salary after 14 July 2023.
The tribunal rejected both claims. It found that the respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from wages by paying the final salary after 14 July 2023, and it also found that the respondent did not breach the contract of employment for the same reason.
The judgment records that, had either claim succeeded, the tribunal would have awarded £637.97 for the wages claim under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 2013 and £637.97 as damages for breach of contract. No such award was made because both claims were dismissed. The respondent's application for a costs order was refused.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from wages by paying the claimant's final salary after 14 July 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent did not breach the claimant's contract of employment by paying his final salary after 14 July 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.