Case 2409093/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Dingivan v Neogen Europe Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409093/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Hodgson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Dingivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge B Hodgson sitting alone in Manchester on 28 April 2022. The issue determined was whether the claimant was in breach of the Unless Order dated 15 March 2022.
The tribunal held that the claimant was not in breach of the Unless Order. As a result, the claims under the Equality Act were allowed to proceed. The judgment does not determine the merits of any substantive discrimination or dismissal claim.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy was awarded or addressed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing on an Unless Order dated 15 March 2022. The tribunal held that the claimant was not in breach of the Unless Order and that the Equality Act claims could proceed. No substantive liability or remedy was decided. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.