Case 2409138/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Campos Cardellat v Creative Group Inc Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409138/2021
- Decision date
- 1 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Campos Cardellat
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 24 August 2022 in Liverpool by CVP, before Employment Judge Benson, the claimant appeared in person with assistance from a friend and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £337.50 gross for unpaid wages for 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 August 2021. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to his notice period and awarded £1,350 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement in respect of 16.5 days and ordered £1,100.25 gross. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The written record also included the standard interest notice, stating that the relevant decision day was 1 September 2022, the calculation day was 2 September 2022, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages for 2, 3, 4, 5 and 9 August 2021. | Upheld | — | £338 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of the notice period and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £1,350 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement in respect of 16.5 days. | Upheld | — | £1,100 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,788
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.