Case 2409159/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Khasal v Sallricate Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409159/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newstead-Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Khasal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss Khasal's claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the case was listed for hearing on 3 February 2021 and that neither the claimant nor the respondent attended that hearing.
After the hearing, Employment Judge Newstead-Taylor wrote to the parties warning that the tribunal was considering striking out the claim on the basis that it was not actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but she did not do so.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment was issued without a hearing, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the reasons; the case was listed on the GOV.UK register as an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.