Case 2409159/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Syra Costello v Natalie Farrar — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409159/2021
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Syra Costello
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Syra Costello brought claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and outstanding holiday pay. The respondent did not file a response in time, and after a case management process that included an unless order, the tribunal rejected the late response under rule 18 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge McDonald then determined the case under rule 21 on the material available.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. It was not able to assess compensation on the papers, so remedy for that claim was left to a separate hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone. The claimant was directed to provide a witness statement and updated schedule of loss, and any award for unfair dismissal was to be assessed with credit for earnings or benefits received after dismissal.
The wrongful dismissal claim also succeeded, with the tribunal ordering £1,416.10 in compensation for dismissal without notice. The holiday pay claim succeeded as well, with £436.92 awarded for holiday accrued but untaken at the date of dismissal. The judgment records that both of those sums had been agreed by Mr Farrar at the case management hearing on 16 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability succeeded, but compensation was not determined on the papers; remedy was directed to a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for dismissal without notice succeeded; the compensation figure was recorded as agreed at the case management hearing on 16 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,416 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay succeeded; the amount was recorded as agreed at the case management hearing on 16 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £437 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,853
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 21 ET Rules
- rule 18 ET Rules
- rule 20 ET Rules
- rule 16 ET Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.