Case 2409165/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Burr v NL Consulting London Ltd (in members voluntary liquidation) c/o Michael Goldstein — 2024
- Case reference
- 2409165/2023
- Decision date
- 5 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Burr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 21 February 2024, Employment Judge Sharkett dealt with the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim against NL Consulting London Ltd (in members voluntary liquidation) c/o Michael Goldstein. The judgment records that neither the claimant nor the respondent appeared at the hearing.
The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. No remedy was awarded, and the written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing. The judgment also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that neither party appeared at the hearing on 21 February 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.