Case 2409167/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ashall v Greater Manchester Business Support Ltd t/a The Growth Company — 2022
- Case reference
- 2409167/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ashall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim of Ms J Ashall against Greater Manchester Business Support Ltd t/a The Growth Company was heard at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 15, 16 and 17 August 2022 before Employment Judge Mark Butler. The written judgment records that the claimant’s case did not succeed and was dismissed.
The decision notice does not set out the tribunal’s substantive reasoning on the face of the written record. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The written record therefore shows a full dismissal of the claim, with no remedy ordered in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claim brought by the claimant did not succeed and was dismissed, but it does not separate findings by claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Gov.uk listing categories for the case included Public Interest Disclosure, but the written judgment does not set out separate reasons or outcomes by individual head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.