Case 2409169/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Barlow v SCSC Realisations Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), (formerly known as S. Cartwright & Sons (Coachbuilders) Limited) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2409169/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal noted that the first respondent had ceased to contest the claim and that it had become clear the claimant was employed by the first respondent, not the second. Under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, all claims against the second respondent were dismissed. All claims against the first respondent except the unfair dismissal complaint were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was well-founded and found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed by the first respondent. It ordered a basic award of £2,887.50, made no compensatory award, and recorded that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded and ordered a basic award only; no compensatory award was made. | Upheld | — | £2,888 |
| Disability discrimination | The short judgment disposes of the non-unfair-dismissal claims collectively rather than setting out separate reasons for this claim. It records dismissal of all claims against the second respondent and dismissal upon withdrawal of all claims against the first respondent other than unfair dismissal. | Other | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The short judgment disposes of the non-unfair-dismissal claims collectively rather than setting out separate reasons for this claim. It records dismissal of all claims against the second respondent and dismissal upon withdrawal of all claims against the first respondent other than unfair dismissal. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,888
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,888
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.